On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 12:37 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 10:22 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I can certainly say I do not have the time and quite likely the skills
> > to create patches so for me to be signing agreements is kinda crazy in
> > my opinion. But I guess I have missed the point somewhere...
>
> Regardless of all the arguments, it's clear that at present we need to
> make it more obvious that you have to sign the CLA, so I'll look into
> that.
I have added a step to the 'how to join' page in the Bugzappers area
which specifically states to sign the CLA.
Lalit, can you sign the CLA, please? I agree it's probably a silly
requirement for triagers, but it doesn't hurt a bit, honestly. :)
I now have SUPAH ADMIN POWAZ, so I've set the group to require cla_done
- so you won't be able to apply for membership until you've signed the
CLA.
I do agree that it seems a mite silly to require the CLA for triagers,
though, so if someone wants to take that to the legal peeps and see if
we can change it, that'd be fine.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net