Re: Shouldn't the fact that beagle doesn't work with both firefox and thunderbird be a release blocker?

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 05/22/2009 01:48 PM, Brian Pepple wrote:
>  On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 09:24 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>     
> > I think search is, nowadays, critical functionality, not only because
> > it is widely used, but because it is built into those other two big
> > operating systems Linux is competing with.
> >
> > I think putting out a release in which search is non-functional for
> > the two most important types of data (email and Web pages), when
> > search was functional for those two types of data in the previous
> > release, would be extremely unwise and a big black eye for Fedora.
> >
> > While I understand the need to have relatively sane criteria for what
> > constitutes a release blocker, it is also, as the ReleaseCriteria page
> > points out, essentially a subjective judgment, and in this case I
> > think that looking at the forest, rather than the trees, would lead to
> > the conclusion that F11 shouldn't ship with these two bugs unfixed.
> >      
>  If we installed Beagle by default I would probably agree with you, but
>  since we don't I don't think these bugs should be considered a blocker
>  for release.  But hey that's just my opinion, maybe the QA leads think
>  differently.
>
>      
Agreed

Since this is not part of the "default install" it should not be considered
a blocker bug.

JBG