Re: New criterion for installation with minimal set of packages
Adam Williamson (awilliam(a)redhat.com) said:
On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 10:52 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Petr Schindler (pschindl(a)redhat.com) said:
> > > Yeah. As far as QA is concerned, the key questions are 'is there a
> > > minimal package set present, does an install with that package set
> > > complete properly, does it boot'. What's *in* it is not really
our
> > > concern.
> >
> > So new beta criteria should be:
> >
> > "The installer must be able to complete package installation with a
minimal usable set of packages"
> >
> > And what "minimal set" means should be defined somewhere else? And
> as soon as it will be somewhere, we should give the link.
>
> @core
That's an implementation detail. It's not a capability-driven
description of which packages should actually be in the minimal package
set, as was discussed earlier in the thread.
Merely stating that if you're linking to what the minimal set of packages
will be, that's it.
Bill