On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 23:01 -0800, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, seth vidal wrote:
> > Adding a barebones install option isn't worth it?
> > Part of it is increasing the flexibility of fedora by allowing it to be
> > installed on a wider array of embedded platforms. The other part is just
> > install efficiency, not having to waste time removing hundreds of rpms
> > which are useless for headless ISP servers.
> I think that's part of it, too - fedora's not really targeting the
> server infrastructure, is it :)
I guess not. It isnt accomodating embedded or constrained hardware either.
desktop-4-evar?
Anyone know a good server distro then? debian I guess?
We use centos for servers.
-sv