On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 09:18:28AM -0400, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 10:02 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jul 21, 2005, jakub(a)redhat.com wrote:
>
> > This update needs to accompany gcc-4.0.1 update.
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > * Thu Jul 21 2005 Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> 1.5.16.multilib2-2
> > - rebuilt with GCC 4.0.1.
>
> Do you realize this is no longer enough? We need apr-devel rebuilds
> to accompany GCC version bumps as well.
can we please stop any such idiocities in cross package version
depencies???? We really really should not have this kind of dependency.
At all. Ever.
Having to update libtool every time gcc's versioned dir changes
is perhaps something I could live with, but having to update all packages
because of it is silly.
It would be preferrable if libtool could special case the versioned
directories in gcc $CFLAGS -print-search-dirs in the libtool script and
recreate them at runtime using gcc $CFLAGS -print-search-dirs.
Jakub