On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 20:11 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Adam Williamson
<adamwill@fedoraproj
ect.org
> wrote:
> Hi folks! So as we noticed today, we have no test case / criterion
> to
> ensure the anaconda help actually works. (Note it was only
> introduced
> in Fedora 21 or 22). I have written a test case:
>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_help
>
> and I'm proposing we add a Final criterion:
>
> * Any element in the installer interface(s) which is clearly
> intended
> to display 'help' text must do so correctly when activated.
>
> We could also require that the intended 'Help' elements must be
> present, but that's a slightly tighter requirement - I'd ask for
> the
> anaconda team's opinion on whether we should do that or not. If we
> don't do that, then if by some chance the Help buttons were
> entirely
> *absent*, that would not be a blocker - only if buttons are present
> but
> don't work would it be a blocker.
>
> I'm proposing we add the criterion, and add the test case to the
> 'Miscellaneous' table of the Installation matrix.
>
As we discussed this on Go/No-Go meeting: validity of this criteria
will
start with F24 release. There are no plans to use this criteria for
F23.
Right Adam ?
That was the idea, yeah, though it seems like we're currently
scrambling to try and do a build with some kind of fix...
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net