On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Yeah, this is kind of problematic, because I don't really want
the
release criteria to prescribe exactly what the 'minimal' package set
should include. Perhaps we should just explicitly refer to 'the
installer's "minimal" package set' or something like that
True - come to think of it, I really don't believe that it is QA's
domain to define the task list - but it should be somebody's. What I
don't want is the feature creep of the "minimal" package set - next
thing you know, GNOME will be part of that package set. But I don't
think that QA is the appropriate place to address those concerns :)