On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 1:58 PM Brandon Nielsen <nielsenb(a)jetfuse.net>
wrote:
On 5/12/20 1:19 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:51 PM Kamil Paral <kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
Work?
> The switching mechanism must correctly attempt the requested operation.
> If the operation doesn't work on a subset of graphical drivers, the release
> blocking decision should be based on the number of affected users, the
> problem severity and available workarounds (as is our [standard
> procedure](Basic_Release_Criteria#Basic_Release_Requirements)[3]).
>
> [snip]
I didn't receive much feedback so far. But since there was enough
supportive feedback in our preliminary discussions, I take it as an
agreement with the current criterion phrasing :-) I'll wait a few more days
for more feedback, and if no one objects, I'll make the criterion live.
I think the snipped section should read more definitively, maybe:
"The switching mechanism must correctly perform the requested operation.
If the operation does not succeed on a subset of graphical drivers, the
release blocking decision should be based on the number of affected users,
the problem severity, and available workarounds (as is our [standard
procedure (Basic_Release_Criteria#Basic_Release_Requirements)[3])."
Thanks. "Succeed" sounds better than "work" in the second sentence. As
for
"attempt" vs "perform" - just to be sure, have you seen my response
to
Lukas Ruzicka where I was talking about it? Do you still think the wording
should be stronger after seeing those other examples I listed?