On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:29:30 -0500, Jerry Amundson wrote:
On 8/10/08, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:21:07 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>> > > > With the older bugzilla, one also encountered those time-outs
when
>> > > > using machines with less than 2 GHz clock rates. With the new
>> > > > bugzilla, the requirement for processor power has increased a
lot.
>> > >
>> > > Processor power in the *client*?
>> >
>> > Yes.
>>
>> It's a web interface to a database. Is the database bigger or more
>> complex than Expedia or Travelocity or Amazon? Does the interaction
>> require more complex Javascript than Google Docs? I don't get it.
>
> It's not the database size. It's the complexity of the dynamic search
> form. Multiple thousands of package names per several product versions,
> for example.
I'll venture to guess that Expedia and Travelocity and Amazon have
complex searches. ;-)
You don't understand. I don't refer the searching, but the web forms
and the client-side processing power that is needed to build them
dynamically with Ajax.
There's more to it. Non-optimized code or SQL? Hardware? OS
tuning?
We're talking past eachother. The problems with bugzilla are on the
_client_.