On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 22:32 -0700, Andrew Farris wrote:
Andrew Farris wrote:
> Rawhide wrote:
>
> A package update list that is totally out of order but should have been
> alphabetical (that was probably obvious).
Since that was the second report out today was that manually generated? Just
occurred to me that would explain the ordering.
Actually it was a different tool, repodiff vs treediff. One uses yum
repodata to compare, the other opens every file. Guess which one is
faster? (:
repodiff probably just needs a tweak to sort things in alphabetical
order rather than repo order. If you want to throw a patch at the
yum-utils upstream that would be hot.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?