On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 17:16, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
Would still be interested to hear if you think a change is in order
about
when rpms are automatically inherited by FC2 development. Don't you think
it would be better if it happened at testing time, rather than when moved
to stable? Although i do like the notion that we test our rpms _before_
we develop them... That's got to make development easier. ;o)
I don't think this test/stable and development/rawhide system is setup
that way. Testing is for making sure the package works before it is
moved to production up2date for the current release.
Development/rawhide is for working on the next release, which once a
package is working fine for the current one, then it's made to work with
the new-to-be release, which will probably have lots of different
dependencies/mechanisms, like the 2.6 kernel, newer kde, gnome and so
on.
LOL, doubt I'm explaining this correctly, hopefully my point is across
at least hehe.
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"It's funny until someone gets hurt...then it's hilarious!"