On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:56 PM Kamil Paral <kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I think this:
"If the release is declared no-go, the bug loses last minute status."
should be part of our policy. I considered it obvious, but I'm sure some
people (/me looking at Frantisek) would argue. Let's put it there.
I am against prohibiting use of last minute status if a release is no-go.
Kamil, we already have "bugs proposed as blockers 5 days or fewer before
the scheduled" in the last minute definition, I'd that's say that's
specific enough.
Also, we might want to preserve last minute "blocker waive" even if a
release is no-go, consider having slip by one day (which is happening
pretty frequently).