Nautilus 3.2.1 Does Not Work

[Jonathan Kamens]

1. It was entirely unnecessary for you to quote an entire list digest in 
a message that had nothing to do with anything in the digest.

2. You're going to need to be a lot more specific than "has never 
worked" if you expect anyone to be able to help you. As you pointed out, 
no one else has reported this problem, which presumably means that it's 
working fine for all of us. We have no idea what you're talking about, 
and you've given us no information we might be able to use to figure it out.

   jik

On 11/7/2011 1:03 PM, James J Catchpole wrote:
>  I have been using Fedora 16 for some time now and Nautilus has never
>
>  worked. I assumed that it would be fixed but so far nothing has been 
>  done. I have been watching for other posts regarding it but have seen 
>  none so perhaps it is limited to my system. I am currently at 
>  nautilus-3.2.1-2.fc16.i686. It is not a disaster as I can use Thunar 
>  as a file manager, but Nautilus is suppose to be an integral component 
>  of gnome.

[Matthias Clasen]

On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 13:03 -0500, James J Catchpole wrote:
>  I have been using Fedora 16 for some time now and Nautilus has never
>  worked. I assumed that it would be fixed but so far nothing has been
>  done. I have been watching for other posts regarding it but have seen
>  none so perhaps it is limited to my system. I am currently at
>  nautilus-3.2.1-2.fc16.i686. It is not a disaster as I can use Thunar
>  as a file manager, but Nautilus is suppose to be an integral component
>  of gnome.
>   
nautilus 3.2.1 works very well here. Can you be more specific about the
problem you are seeing, beyond 'never worked' ?

[Joachim Backes]

On 11/07/2011 07:03 PM, James J Catchpole wrote:
>  I have been using Fedora 16 for some time now and Nautilus has never
>  worked. I assumed that it would be fixed but so far nothing has been
>  done. I have been watching for other posts regarding it but have seen
>  none so perhaps it is limited to my system. I am currently at
>  nautilus-3.2.1-2.fc16.i686. It is not a disaster as I can use Thunar as
>  a file manager, but Nautilus is suppose to be an integral component of
>  gnome. 
James,

I can't see this! I'm working with nautilus since the very first
versions (alpha) of F16, actually with  nautilus-3.2.1-2.fc16.x86_64,
but having no problems all in all. Additionally, you did not describe
which problems you have :-) Why?

Kind regards

-- 
Joachim Backes <joachim.backes(a)rhrk.uni-kl.de&gt;

http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes