cloud July 2015

cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

21 participants
75 discussions

Fedora 22 Cloud image with systemd-networkd
by Kushal Das 22 Jul '15

22 Jul '15

Hi all, I have made one Fedora 22 image with systemd-networkd for network configuration. The image is at [1], and the corresponding blog post can be found at [2]. Please have a look, and test the image. Reply back in this email, or make a comment in the blog post if you have any trouble in using the image. [1] http://kushaldas.in/networkd.qcow2 [2] http://kushaldas.in/posts/testing-fedora-cloud-image-with-systemd-networkd.… Kushal -- Fedora Cloud Engineer CPython Core Developer CentOS Cloud SIG lead http://kushaldas.in

1 0

Regrets for today's meeting
by Joe Brockmeier 22 Jul '15

22 Jul '15

Hey all, Apologies for missing meetings lately, and... won't be able to make this week either due to attending OSCON. :-( Will try to keep an eye on meeting minutes to see if there's anything needed on my end. Summer/conference season is cray cray. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by Dusty Mabe 20 Jul '15

20 Jul '15

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2015-07-22 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/

1 0

Re: Does Fedora 22 Atomic host install on real hardware for anyone else?
by Robert Knight 16 Jul '15

16 Jul '15

Hi, Colin. On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:59:57 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Robert Knight wrote: >> Failed to pull from repository: g-io-error-quark://run/install/repo/ >> content/repo: open: No such file or directory (1) > This sounds likehttps://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/104 Just to get this clear, here are things I learned: 1. Anaconda's screen switching is not what I thought. To get to the command line, one must use ctrl-F1, ctrl-B, 2. I believe at one time ctrl-F2 did the same thing, but it does not now. Once I discovered this, I could start debugging my problem. 2. My institution uses a very ancient DHCP server that does not work with the modern Anacondas at all, so I have to specify, on the kernel command line, all of the networking parameters to have anything work. I was using one of our local DNS servers as the only DNS. This does not work and I did not chase it beyond discovering that there were no routes available to the installer. However, if I use the Google DNS 8.8.8.8, there are routes and the installation does succeed. 3. Somehow, the availability of the routes allows the mounting of the repo from the installation CD. Thanks to those who responded. I hope this adds to the group's knowledge. Regards, Robert

1 0

Re: Cloud image use cases
by Matthew Miller 15 Jul '15

15 Jul '15

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:35:14PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > It sounds like "atomic" is more of a flavor than a product. There's a > proposal on desktop@ for Atomic Workstation. Is the Server WG > interested in an atomic variant as well? I think that's "Atomic" Workstation, with "Atomic" in quotes - unless there's a lot of change in both projects, think it'd be more confusing than not to actually call it that. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader

1 0

Cloud SIG release work
by Paul W. Frields 13 Jul '15

13 Jul '15

Hi Cloud SIG folks, I wanted to let you know that David Gay is pursuing other opportunities outside the Fedora Engineering team at Red Hat. He told me he wants to continue to contribute to Fedora, so you may still see him around. In the meantime, I'm working with Kushal Das and others as needed to pick up the critical tasks David was handling as part of his day job, so Fedora releases aren't unduly affected. If and when Red Hat opens up a slot for that position, I'll let the community know. Thanks as always for your contributions and your understanding! -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by Dusty Mabe 13 Jul '15

13 Jul '15

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2015-07-15 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/

1 0

Does Fedora 22 Atomic host install on real hardware for anyone else?
by Robert Knight 13 Jul '15

13 Jul '15

I've tried various pieces of hardware (all Dell) with the Atomic host image (Fedora-Cloud_Atomic-x86_64-22.iso) unsuccessfully. Am I using the wrong iso? The symptom is the same every time. Once installation actually starts, anaconda crashes with The following error occurred while installing. This is a fatal error and installation will be aborted. Failed to pull from repository: g-io-error-quark://run/install/repo/ content/repo: open: No such file or directory (1) Alt-F2 does not give me a shell, so at this point, I'm stuck trying to locate what is wrong. Suggestions?

2 1

Cloud image use cases
by Josh Boyer 13 Jul '15

13 Jul '15

Hi All, I was hoping someone could clarify the use cases for the cloud image, particularly in light of the reductions being looked at (like removing python). I ask because I honestly don't know what purpose the cloud image is serving any longer. The atomic image is squarely targeted at being small, and for running containers. It is somewhat positioned as a CoreOS solution. With that being the case, I'm curious how the cloud image is different and not a repetitive image simply not using the atomic mechanisms. thanks. josh

7 27

/usr/bin/ps missing from fedora:22 docker base image
by Brian Exelbierd 13 Jul '15

13 Jul '15

Hi, It appears that /usr/bin/ps was dropped as it was an indirect dependency in f21. Can we put it back? If this was a purposeful decision, can someone point me at the thread as I couldn't find the discussion. The dependency chain, for those interested was: procps needed by initscripts needed by dhclient|ppp needed by NetworkManager needed by rolekit needed by fedora-release-server|generic-release-server needed by generic-release needed by fedora-repos needed by fedora-release Thank you. regards, bex

4 10

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cloud July 2015