On 07/24/2014 10:38 AM, Haïkel wrote:
At this stage, Cockpit brings no value to regular cloud images.
Cloud
users rather use the API and console provided by their providers or
regular tools.
That was my thinking, but wasn't sure if I was missing something.
Beside that goes against the effort of trimming down cloud images
Also - the normal cloud images *can* be updated to include Cockpit later
if someone wants to have Cockpit in their AMI or whatever, yeah?
So - I think we're agreed on that? Any -1's to omitting Cockpit?
Thanks,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
jzb(a)redhat.com |
http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb |
http://dissociatedpress.net/