On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 02:10:05PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> But in order to be really useful unless they're all-in on
Fedora, many
> people will want the python version for their
> infrastructure/environment, not whichever python we happen to ship in a
> given release.
"I will provide flexibility and utility by providing no flexibility
and utility" sounds like a crappy marketing point to me.
Well, if we got a resounding "python is definitely the one thing we
want", that'd be one thing. The first-round plan was to offer a very
lightweight image — minimal + provisioning utils like cloud-init —
and then language stacks via SCLs. Adding those was where the utility
was supposed to come from.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader