On 12/14/2012 08:21 AM, Florian La Roche wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 09:17:21AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 08:05:06AM -0600, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> It's frustrating enough on a local machine when an update goes wrong.
>> But on an Amazon machine, you have no console during bootup. So if
>> something is going wrong during bootup ... you're out of luck.
> Yeah. On the other hand, with Fedora's fast pace, leading edge nature, and
> huge package selection, I feel like we're doing our users a disservice by
> not providing some level of protection.
Add new images will all updates applied and minimal tests of them.
> What if we did security updates only, by default? (Right now, yum-cron
> doesn't support this, so it'd be a F19 feature.)
Might be an option, not sure this is stable enough.
Florian La Roche
I have no problem with automatic security only updates on Fedora, if we
can do that.