Re: Proposal: Release blocking for F27
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Colin Walters <walters(a)verbum.org> wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435310
raised the issue that apparently, Atomic Host isn't "release blocking".
I think we have plenty of resources to match whatever criteria
there are for that for Fedora 27. Thoughts?
Does it make sense for Atomic Host to be "release blocking" when we
can just release every two weeks (or really whenever we want) where as
traditional release is bound to the standard cycle? It's loosely
coupled.
I would like be clear that I'm not saying or suggesting it either is
or it isn't, but I'm not convinced either direction and I'm curious
what others think about the justification of not being tightly bound
to the release cycle.
-AdamM
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list -- cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org