-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Google requires you to sign an NDA, that is something that Fedora has
no ability to do, it will need to be sorted out between Red Hat and
Googles lawyers. As such we can not offer an official image in GCE
until its sorted out.
El Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:32:09 +0000
Vaidas Jablonskis <jablonskis(a)gmail.com> escribió:
So if I understand correctly, I have to sign an NDA to be able to
freely upload Fedora cloud images onto GCE even for testing?
If that's the case, could you give me more information who I should
contact or where should I look for more information on getting this
Any help is appreciated!
On 22 January 2014 02:49, Dennis Gilmore <dennis(a)ausil.us> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> El Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:24:31 +0000
> Vaidas Jablonskis <jablonskis(a)gmail.com> escribió:
> > Hi People,
> > I am pretty new to contributing to Fedora, especially the cloud
> > group.
> > I have mentioned a few times on IRC (nickname: zooz) that I have
> > started working on GCE cloud image.
> > So I thought I will give you an update on my progress so other
> > people can jump in or help me to figure out the process.
> > So far so good, GCE image does not seem to look much different
> > that already existing OpenStack/EC2 images.
> > - kickstart files for appliance-creator:
> > https://github.com/vaijab/fedora-gce-image
> > - gcimagebundle spec/srpm/copr:
> > https://github.com/vaijab/gcimagebundle-rpm
> > - google-compute-daemon spec/srpm/copr:
> > https://github.com/vaijab/google-compute-daemon-rpm
> > I understand that you guys might not want to use google provided
> > daemons for managing ssh keys, users and forwarded IP addresses,
> > but I thought I will package it up just in case.
> > Current blockers:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055181
> > accepted my patch and it's been submitted to updates-testing, so
> > it should be fine soon.
> > So with what I currently have, I am able to build an image
> > without any issues which runs on GCE perfectly.
> > If anyone could have a quick poke at my RPM spec files and let me
> > know if there are any major issues with them before I submit them
> > for a review for the first time :-) Also if anyone wants to
> > sponsor my fedora packager membership I'd really appreciate that.
> > So what are the next steps? How do we actually start a process of
> > getting appliance KS files upstream?
> > Any pointers and feedback is welcome. If anyone wants to jump in
> > and help - please do so!
> afaik the existing images hsould work just fine, cloud-init may need
> some tweaking to work right. The issue we have AFAIK is that you
> have to sign a NDA to upload images, That is not something we are
> able to do. We will need to send a request to Red Hat legal via
> Fedora Legal to come to some agreement.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> cloud mailing list
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----