Agreed, it doesn't make sense to keep 32bit images for these.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Sam Kottler <s(a)shk.io> wrote:
On 2014-04-30 21:55, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't think we
> actually covered the specialized images.
>
> Docker doesn't even support 32 bit hosts -- it may someday, but even then,
> the assumption of most containers is gonna be 64-bit x86_64.
>
> And I don't think it makes sense to have a 32-bit big data image, but
> maybe
> I'm wrong on that for certain workloads?
>
+1 on only supporting a 64-bit image at least for big data and docker. I
can't think of any tools or applications thereof that would make sense to
run 32-bit but maybe mattf, willb, or others know of some?
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct