----- Original Message -----
From: "Dmitry Makovey" <dmitry(a)athabascau.ca>
To: "Fedora Cloud SIG" <cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 3:02:20 PM
Subject: Re: EC2 cloud image size
On 12/17/2014 02:09 PM, David Gay wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 03:07:12PM -0700, Dmitry Makovey wrote:
>>> Does it mean that "soon enough" we'll see an updated AMI with
>>> moderate disk demands?
>>
>> For some value of "soon enough", yeah. Sorry about that -- I'm
>> checking with David Gay, who wrote the uploader.
>
> Yeah, this was my oversight. Seems the cloud base image is only 425
> MB. I can produce new AMIs right now. Do you think a 1 GB or 500 MB
> drive would be best, or something else?
/gentle/ bump?
Is any help required to get F21 "smaller" images to AWS? I'd love to
help (if I can) since I'm interested in the outcome myself.
--
Dmitry Makovey
Web Systems Administrator
Athabasca University
(780) 675-6245
---
Confidence is what you have before you understand the problem
Woody Allen
When in trouble when in doubt run in circles scream and shout
http://www.wordwizard.com/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=19330
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hey -- I actually solved this problem during the holidays. Lowered the size to 3 GB as
suggested. There just haven't been any new builds that have gone through, and I
haven't cut a new version just yet anyway (due to the holidays). It's no problem
for me to send someone a list of fresh AMIs of the F21 cloud build with the lowered size
tomorrow, if someone can toss them on the official website, as well. But yeah, this is all
done. Just had to tweak two numbers is all.
-- oddshocks