On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:00:43AM -0500, Scott Collier wrote:
>My opinion is that the dist-git-for-dockerfiles plan should make
How would users who aren't necessarily involved in the Fedora build
process experiment building images with a Fedora base? Right now
Hopefully this new dist-git can be fronted by pagure, so it'd be a
matter of visiting a web site like https://pagure.io/fedora-bootstrap
(not a docker example, just a random one) and either downloading the
docker file or doing a git clone.
there's a rpm created from fedora-dockerfiles that includes all
Dockerfiles and makes it easy to experiment by placing all the
Dockerfiles in /usr/share/fedora-dockerfiles. If we keep them both,
it's somewhat duplicate work. I'm just curious how it would look.
Right now the barrier to entry for experimentation is low. I'm
concerned about raising that.
Yeah, that's a good concern. We could also perhaps automate pulling all
the dockerfiles from the dist-git into fedora-dockerfiles and keep
that, for people who want to work with it that way.
Also, the plan was for Vasek to submit Nulecule PRs to
Fedora-dockerfiles, at some point, so people could experiment with
them as well. I'd also like to see k8s example json / yaml files
associated with select fedora-dockerfiles for easy experimentation.
Would the nulecule / k8s get pushed into the dist-git as well?
Maybe? Would it make sense for these to go together with the
dockerfiles they're associated with in a git repo at that level, or
would they be stand-alone and reference other repos? (Do you have some
Another approach to all this would be to keep all the dockerfiles in
one place -- it just means that everyone who has any commit access to
anything gets commit access to everything, which we might not want as
Fedora Project Leader