#57: Seeking Council feedback/input on draft third party software policy
-------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: pfrields | Owner:
Status: new | Priority: normal
Component: General | Resolution:
Keywords: workstation |
-------------------------+---------------------
Comment (by mattdm):
Also: I think we're mostly discussing nuances of what I called "the second
part". Aside from possible clarifications of phrasing, are all Council
members okay with "part 1"? That is, something like:
The Fedora Council supports a third-party software policy that conforms
to Fedora's definition of free and open source software. The policy must
require a distinction between Fedora-provided and third-party software
that is clear to novice users. The selection and curation process for
third-party software must be community-based and transparent.
?
Is anyone ''opposed'' to this?
--
Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/council/ticket/57#comment:27>
council <
https://fedorahosted.org/council>
Fedora Council Public Tickets