Re: forming the Modules WG
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:47:08AM +0000, White, Langdon wrote:
> Was that initial members? Then voting took place after that?
Yeah, then each group came up with their own charter and rules for
replacing members. Only Env & Stacks went for full open elections for
replacement, FWIW.
Looks like lot of fun for the one who will organize these elections :-)
Jan
> > Also, now is the time to nail down any bikeshed painting
anyone has on
> > Modules WG vs Modularity WG vs Modularization WG. (Modularizing WG?
> > Modulatory WG? Modulating WG? Okay time for some coffee.)
> Oscillating WG?
> Seriously though, my preference is for Modularity WG, but I haven't got any
> paint.
*hands you some paint*
Quick, change the wiki pages before anyone notices.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
council-discuss mailing list
council-discuss(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/council-discuss@lists.fedorapr...
The Fedora Project's mission is to lead the advancement of free and
open source software and content as a collaborative community.
--
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic