On 25 August 2016 at 14:42, Zoltan Hoppar <hopparz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
These were IMHO used for Transifex purpose. For us I think these
lists
are more and less useless. IMHO we need governance list for issues,
one for translation (we have it - trans fpo), one for i18n for sure -
but do we need that much?
Definitely not :)
less and active mailing list is better. Lets wait for reply and i hope we
can proceed with infra for disabling these.
Thanks,
Pravin
Zoltan
2016-08-25 8:35 GMT+02:00 pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com <pravin.d.s(a)gmail.com>:
>
>
> On 25 August 2016 at 12:00, Jean-Baptiste Holcroft
> <jean-baptiste(a)holcroft.fr> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> can you please tell us what are the goald of those FAS group ?
>>
>> Translation CVS Commit Group (cvsl10n) -> Karsten Wade kwade(a)redhat.com
>>
>> l10n Commit Group (l10n-commits) -> Dimitris Glezos dimitris(a)glezos.com
>>
>> l10n Admin Group (l10n-admin) ->Dimitris Glezos dimitris(a)glezos.com
>>
>> Localization (L10n) Editors (l10n-editor) -> Diego Búrigo Zacarão
>> diegobz(a)gmail.com
>>
>>
>> if no answer in the next weeks, I will assume they are not in use
anymore.
>>
>
> Perfect !!
> * If groups are useful, we will change Admins.
> * If groups not useful, simply disable/deactivate it.
>
> Thanks,
> Pravin
>
> _______________________________________________
> g11n mailing list
> g11n(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/g11n@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
PGP: 06853DF7
_______________________________________________
g11n mailing list
g11n(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/g11n@lists.fedoraproject.org