Sign In
Sign Up
Sign In
Sign Up
Manage this list
2024
April
March
February
January
2023
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2022
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2021
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2020
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2019
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2018
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2017
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2016
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2015
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2014
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2013
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2012
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2011
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2010
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2009
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2008
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2007
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2006
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January
2005
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
List overview
Download
thread
Re: [fedora-java] java specfile reviewfest
Andrew Overholt
Saturday, 10 February 2007
Sat, 10 Feb '07
11:25 a.m.
Hi, * Andrew Overholt <overholt(a)redhat.com> [2007-02-09 17:35]:
...
Some of us have decided to get together on Monday 12 February to grind through reviews for both the new packages required for maven2 and those for the existing core packages.
The maven2 review requests are here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type=allwords...
Deepak made a graph of build dependencies and we think these ones can be done without depending on something that isn't currently in core: jtidy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227075
gnu-regexp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227057
bea-stax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227041
xmldb-api
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227123
ant-contrib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227027
dom2-core-tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227048
isorelax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227061
relagxngDatatype
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227112
objectweb-anttask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227091
tagsoup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227117
classpathx-jaxp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227046
icu4j
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199592
xpp2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227126
xpp3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227127
junitperf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227077
piccolo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227092
javassist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227067
gnu-trove (I can't find the review request for this one ... Rafael? Deepak?) jrexx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227074
jflex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227070
servletapi4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227116
jython
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193898
This has already been approved but we need to investigate the inclusion of python 2.2. Is it just a BR? If not, I'm concerned about shipping another python version in the distro. We're also not sure if it's completely necessary ... supposedly batik needs it but we're hoping we can avoid that dependency. plexus-utils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227106
dtdparser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227050
emma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227052
jakarta-commons-cli
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227063
nekohtml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227090
jakarta-commons-io
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227064
maven2-common-poms (need to remove erroneous saxon BR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227079
Andrew
Attachments:
attachment.sig
(application/pgp-signature — 189 bytes)
0
/
0
Reply
Back to the thread
Back to the list