Am Mi 12.Dezember 2007 schrieb Sebastian Vahl:
Am Mi 12.Dezember 2007 schrieb Sebastian Vahl:
> Am Mi 12.Dezember 2007 schrieb Jeremy Katz:
> > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:57 +0100, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> > > I'm still unable to don't include firefox on a livecd (although
the
> > > xulrunner/firefox conflict is resolved). I'm not even having an idea
> > > why it is included in my local spins. I've explicitely removed it
> > > from livecd-fedora-base-desktop.ks and livecd-fedora-kde.ks (with
> > > "-firefox") and it shouldn't be needed by any package
(since
> > > xulrunner is there). I can easily remove it on a running livecd (or
> > > even with "--shell") and rpm is not complaining about
dependencies
> > > then.
> > >
> > > firefox is installed right aside xulrunner, so I'm assuming it's
> > > maybe related to the provides from firefox (esp. gecko-libs).
> >
> > Are you explicitly listing xulrunner in your %packages section? If not
> > and if there's something depending on an unversioned gecko-libs, then
> > firefox could well be getting chosen as the shortest provider of
> > gecko-libs
>
> No I haven't listed xulrunner (only as "-xulrunner") and don't
even want
> this one (but that's another problem: #420101).
>
> So the next step is maybe: Figure out what is requirering the unversioned
> gecko-libs and file a bug against that package?
Mhh. The only package requireing gecko-libs is yelp. But that one has a
versioned require (gecko-libs = 1.9).
... and firefox is only providing gecko-libs = 1.8.1.10.