Am Mi 12.Dezember 2007 schrieb Jeremy Katz:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:57 +0100, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> I'm still unable to don't include firefox on a livecd (although the
> xulrunner/firefox conflict is resolved). I'm not even having an idea why
> it is included in my local spins. I've explicitely removed it from
> livecd-fedora-base-desktop.ks and livecd-fedora-kde.ks (with "-firefox")
> and it shouldn't be needed by any package (since xulrunner is there). I
> can easily remove it on a running livecd (or even with "--shell") and rpm
> is not complaining about dependencies then.
>
> firefox is installed right aside xulrunner, so I'm assuming it's maybe
> related to the provides from firefox (esp. gecko-libs).
Are you explicitly listing xulrunner in your %packages section? If not
and if there's something depending on an unversioned gecko-libs, then
firefox could well be getting chosen as the shortest provider of
gecko-libs
No I haven't listed xulrunner (only as "-xulrunner") and don't even want
this
one (but that's another problem: #420101).
So the next step is maybe: Figure out what is requirering the unversioned
gecko-libs and file a bug against that package?
Sebastian