Am Mi 12.Dezember 2007 schrieb Sebastian Vahl:
Am Mi 12.Dezember 2007 schrieb Jeremy Katz:
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:57 +0100, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> > I'm still unable to don't include firefox on a livecd (although the
> > xulrunner/firefox conflict is resolved). I'm not even having an idea
> > why it is included in my local spins. I've explicitely removed it from
> > livecd-fedora-base-desktop.ks and livecd-fedora-kde.ks (with
> > "-firefox") and it shouldn't be needed by any package (since
xulrunner
> > is there). I can easily remove it on a running livecd (or even with
> > "--shell") and rpm is not complaining about dependencies then.
> >
> > firefox is installed right aside xulrunner, so I'm assuming it's maybe
> > related to the provides from firefox (esp. gecko-libs).
>
> Are you explicitly listing xulrunner in your %packages section? If not
> and if there's something depending on an unversioned gecko-libs, then
> firefox could well be getting chosen as the shortest provider of
> gecko-libs
No I haven't listed xulrunner (only as "-xulrunner") and don't even
want
this one (but that's another problem: #420101).
So the next step is maybe: Figure out what is requirering the unversioned
gecko-libs and file a bug against that package?
Mhh. The only package requireing gecko-libs is yelp. But that one has a
versioned require (gecko-libs = 1.9).
So this problem may also be fixed as a side-effect when #420101 is resolved.
But I'm still wondering why firefox is pulled in?
Sebastian