Le Jeu 15 janvier 2009 02:33, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit :
Jens Petersen wrote:
> ----- "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> The draft is available here:
> Sorry but this is not a good idea IMO. It requires 119 binary font
> packages in rawhide to be renamed, a number of which are referenced
> by a number of other packages in the distro.
This could be taken care of by not renaming existing packages. What's
your preference, to grandfather or not to grandfather?
I can't write font-packaging-support rpm macros that handle every
possible naming variants, sorry. All the font packages in a release
need to follow the same rules if you want spec files kept simple and