October 2021 - packaging - Fedora Mailing-Lists

Automatic virtual provides for RPM macros?

by Miro Hrončok

Hello, today at Nest, somebody said "unfortunately, there is no way to tell what package to install to get a particular RPM macro". I think that having an RPM provides generator for "rpm-macro(__python3)" or similar should be a fairly simple exercise. Would you folks consider that useful? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

2 months, 3 weeks

4
4
0 / 0

RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal

by Ben Cotton

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rpm_level_auto_release_and_changel... == Summary == redhat-rpm-config will be updated so users of the auto framework get automated release and changelog bumping. == Owner == * Name: [[User:nim| Nicolas Mailhot]] * Email: <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net> == Detailed Description == This is a system-wide change because all packages build with redhat-rpm-config, but it only concerns packages that opted to use this part of redhat-rpm-config (auto framework). The change will make those packages auto-bump and auto-changelog at the rpm level, in an infrastructure-independent way. == Benefit to Fedora == Autobumping removes a huge packager shore and makes timestamping in changelogs more reliable. == Scope == * Proposal owners: The feature is coded and works at the rpm level. Unfortunately, mock filters away the srpms containing the bump state, so it does not work in upper layers. * Other developers: The feature requires buy-in by mock developers (and probably koji developers) to lift the restrictions that block it above the rpm level. Also, it requires a mechanism to pass the user name and email that will be used in bumped changelogs (defining two variables in ~/.rpmmacros is sufficient at rpm level) * Mock issue: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/599 * Release engineering: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9567 * Policies and guidelines: maybe eventually if things work out on the technical level * FPC issue: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/998 * Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change) == Upgrade/compatibility impact == This is a pure build tooling update, it changes how things are built not what is built. == How To Test == A redhat-rpm-config packages with the changes and some example packages are available in https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/refactoring-forge-patches-aut... Since the mock/copr layer is currently blocking the feature, you need to install the redhat-rpm-config and forge macro packages available in this repo locally. Afterwards you can take any of the example packages in the repo and rebuild them with rpmbuild -ba to your heart content, and see the releases bump and the changelogs being updated accordingly. To get beautiful changelogs, you also need to add <pre> %buildsys_name Your name %buildsys_email Your email </pre> in ~/.rpmmacros == User Experience == N/A Packager experience change only == Dependencies == The change is a spin-off of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Patches_in_Forge_macros_-_Auto_mac... Therefore, it depends on the success of that other change and will probably need rebasing if the code in this other change evolves during the redhat-rpm-config merge. It also depends on mock / copr/ koji buy-in and changes, that may add their own requirements. == Contingency Plan == There is no contingency plan because the change will happen or not at all. == Documentation == There is as much documentation as the average redhat-rpm-config change (ie comments in the macro files themselves) == Release Notes == N/A Packager productivity change only -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis

9 months, 3 weeks

12
23
0 / 0

Fwd: Converting montserrat spec to new version

by Sérgio Basto

Hi Luya I'm sending this email to packaging Mailing List ... I'm also facing problems with some fonts packages, see this error [3]. How I convert %_font_pkg ? from https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/lpf-mscore-fonts.git/tree/mscore-... Thank you . [3] warning: This package uses obsolete macros that will go away soon. Please convert to the spec templates provided by fonts-rpm-templates! -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Luya Tshimbalanga <luya(a)fedoraproject.org> Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Converting montserrat spec to new version Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 22:07:59 -0700 Hello team, I started converting the current julietaula-montserrat-fonts spec to the new version [1] using ibm-plex-fonts as template [2], but struggled to understand the functionality. Here is an example below: -- BuildArch: noarch %global fontpkgname julietaula-montserrat %global fontconf 61-%{fontpkgname} # Override versioning to sync with upstream Epoch: 1 Version: 7.222 Release: %autorelease URL: https://github.com/JulietaUla/Montserrat %global foundry julietaula %global fontlicense OFL %global fontlicenses OFL.txt %global fontdocsex %{fontlicenses} %global fontfamily1 Montserrat %global fontsummary1 Sans-serif typeface inspired from Montserrat area %global fonts1 *.otf %global fontdescription1 %{expand: A typeface inspired by signs around the Montserrat area \ of Buenos Aires, Argentina.} %global fontfamily2 MontserratAlternates %global fontsummary2 Sans-serif typeface inspired from Montserrat area %global fonts2 *.otf %global fontdescription1 %{expand: A typeface inspired by signs around the Montserrat area \ of Buenos Aires, Argentina.} Source0: %{url}/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz#/Montserrat- %{version}.tar.gz Source1: %{name}-fontconfig.conf Source2: %{name}-alternates-fontconfig.conf Source3: %{fontpkgname}.metainfo.xml Source4: %{fontpkgname}-alternates.metainfo.xml BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel BuildRequires: libappstream-glib Requires: fontpackages-filesystem # Reset the old date based versioning Obsoletes: %{name} < 1:%{version}-%{release} %description %{common_description} %package common Summary: Common files for %{name} Requires: fontpackages-filesystem %description common %{common_description} This package consists of files used by other %{name} packages. %package -n %{fontpkgname} Summary: Base version of the Montserrat area inspired typeface Requires: %{name}-common = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fo As noticed, two subpackaged webfonts are listed because they are required from the landing page for Fedora Apache. I ntpkgname} %{common_description} This package provide the base fonts. %package -n %{fontpkgname}-alternates-fonts Summary: A Montserrat area inspired typeface family alternate version Requires: %{name}-common = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontpkgname}-alternates-fonts %{common_description} This package provide an alternate version of the fonts. %package -n %{fontpkgname}-base-web-fonts Summary: Web fonts version of the Montserrat area inspired typeface Requires: %{name}-common = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontpkgname}-base-web-fonts %{common_description} This package include essential web fonts. %package -n %{fontpkgname}-extra-web-fonts Summary: Extra web fonts version of the Montserrat area inspired typeface Requires: %{name}-common = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release} %description -n %{fontpkgname}-extra-web-fonts %{common_description} This package includes extra web fonts. %prep %autosetup -c %build %fontbuild %install %fontinstall install -m 0644 -p Montserrat-%{version}/fonts/webfonts/*.woff %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0644 -p Montserrat-%{version}/fonts/webfonts/*.woff2 %{buildroot}%{_fontdir} install -m 0755 -d %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir} # Install Montserrat fonts install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE1} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}.conf # Install MontserratAlternates fonts install -m 0644 -p %{SOURCE2} \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_templatedir}/%{fontconf}-alternates.conf for fconf in %{fontconf}.conf \ %{fontconf}-alternates.conf ; do ln -s %{_fontconfig_templatedir}/$fconf \ %{buildroot}%{_fontconfig_confdir}/$fconf done # Add AppStream metadata file, Repeat for every font family install -Dm 0644 -p %{SOURCE3} \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/metainfo/%{fontpkgname}.metainfo.xml install -Dm 0644 -p %{SOURCE4} \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/metainfo/%{fontpkgname}-alternates.metainfo.xml %check appstream-util validate-relax --nonet %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/metainfo/%{fontpkgname}.metainfo.xml appstream-util validate-relax --nonet %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/metainfo/%{fontpkgname}- alternates.metainfo.xml %_font_pkg -f %{fontconf}.conf Montserrat-*.otf %{_datadir}/metainfo/%{fontpkgname}.metainfo.xml %_font_pkg -n alternates -f %{fontconf}-alternates.conf MontserratAlternates-*.otf %{_datadir}/metainfo/%{fontpkgname}-alternates.metainfo.xml %_font_pkg -n base-web Montserrat-{Regular,Light,Bold,ExtraBold,Italic}.{woff,woff2} %_font_pkg -n extra-web Montserrat*.{woff,woff2} %files common %license Montserrat-%{version}/OFL.txt %doc Montserrat-%{version}/README.md %changelog %autochangelog ---- As noticed, two subpackaged webfonts are listed because they are required from the landing page for Fedora Apache. The challenge is to keep these lines with the new spec version. Pointers welcome. Thanks in advance. Reference: [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/ [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ibm-plex-fonts/blob/rawhide/f/ibm-plex... -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Sérgio M. B.

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-10-14 16:00 UTC)

by James Antill

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2021-10-14 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.libera.chat. Local time information (via. uitime): ================= Day: Thursday ================== 2021-10-14 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2021-10-14 12:00 EDT --> US/Eastern <-- 2021-10-14 16:00 UTC UTC 2021-10-14 17:00 BST Europe/London 2021-10-14 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin 2021-10-14 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris 2021-10-14 21:30 IST Asia/Calcutta ---------------- New Day: Friday ----------------- 2021-10-15 00:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong 2021-10-15 00:00 +08 Asia/Singapore 2021-10-15 01:00 JST Asia/Tokyo 2021-10-15 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting = Followup Actions = #topic #pr-814 * mhroncok talk to authors again, having a working example might help a lot = Followup Issues = #topic #886 Enable BRP for detecting RPATH .fpc 886 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/886 #topic #907 Which %__foo macros for executables are acceptable? .fpc 907 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/907 #topic #1058 How to handle %lang files in package owned directories? .fpc 1058 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1058 = Followup Pull Requests = #topic #pr-814 Add SELinux Independent Policy Guidelines. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/814 #topic #pr-1045 WIP: Add discussion of macro names beginning with underscores. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1045 #topic #pr-1046 Improve separate test suite sourcing instructions https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1046 #topic #pr-1071 Overhaul the RPATH section of the guidelines. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1071 #topic #pr-1074 Require deleting unused bundled libraries during %prep https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1074 #topic #pr-1077 Introduce %sysusers_create https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1077 #topic #pr-1094 Add documentation for build constraints macro https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1094 #topic #pr-1097 Use caret in Obsoletes to simplify https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1097 = New Issues = #topic #1099 Contradicting sections regarding duplicate files .fpc 1099 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1099 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can: * Reply to this e-mail * File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee * E-mail me directly * Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux

by Konrad Kleine

Dear Fedora packagers, developers and users, we have some good news for you: We are beginning to build nightly snapshot packages of LLVM for the latest versions of Fedora Linux (currently 34, 35 and rawhide) for a growing list of architectures. You can grab them here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/fedora-llvm-team/llvm-snapshots/ Feel free to enable the copr repository with $ dnf copr enable @fedora-llvm-team/llvm-snapshots and then install the i.e. latest clang with $ dnf install clang Beware, that a snapshot release of LLVM is probably more unstable than a regular release! If you run into a problem, I would kindly ask you to wait and try it again with the next snapshot. We hope you enjoy this peek into the next version of LLVM that you can now try without too much hassle and without compiling it every day on your own. Regards, Konrad Kleine Senior Software Engineer, Platform Tools Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> kkleine(a)redhat.com M: +49(0)151/21000244 D87A 77F4 2A58 C72D 12A7 203B C0A0 2C32 BCB7 3099 <https://www.redhat.com>

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-10-07 16:00 UTC)

by James Antill

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2021-10-07 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.libera.chat. Local time information (via. uitime): ================= Day: Thursday ================== 2021-10-07 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2021-10-07 12:00 EDT --> US/Eastern <-- 2021-10-07 16:00 UTC UTC 2021-10-07 17:00 BST Europe/London 2021-10-07 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin 2021-10-07 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris 2021-10-07 21:30 IST Asia/Calcutta ---------------- New Day: Friday ----------------- 2021-10-08 00:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong 2021-10-08 00:00 +08 Asia/Singapore 2021-10-08 01:00 JST Asia/Tokyo 2021-10-08 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting = Followup Actions = #topic #pr-814 * mhroncok talk to authors again, having a working example might help a lot = Followup Issues = #topic #886 Enable BRP for detecting RPATH .fpc 886 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/886 #topic #907 Which %__foo macros for executables are acceptable? .fpc 907 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/907 #topic #1058 How to handle %lang files in package owned directories? .fpc 1058 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1058 = Followup Pull Requests = #topic #pr-814 Add SELinux Independent Policy Guidelines. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/814 #topic #pr-1045 WIP: Add discussion of macro names beginning with underscores. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1045 #topic #pr-#1046 Improve separate test suite sourcing instructions https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1046 #topic #pr-1071 Overhaul the RPATH section of the guidelines. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1071 #topic #pr-1074 Require deleting unused bundled libraries during %prep https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1074 #topic #pr-1077 Introduce %sysusers_create https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1077 = New Issues = #topic #1099 Contradicting sections regarding duplicate files .fpc 1099 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1099 #topic #1107 Soft-static allocation of gids for "tcb passwd shadowing" .fpc 1107 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1107 = New Pull Requests = #topic #pr-#1094 Add documentation for build constraints macro https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1094 #topic #pr-#1097 Use caret in Obsoletes to simplify https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1097 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can: * Reply to this e-mail * File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee * E-mail me directly * Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

1 year, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

packaging October 2021