Packaging of PlayOnLinux
by Jiří Konečný
Hello all,
is there any reason why the PlayOnLinux is not in Fedora repository? I
know that they have database of proprietary stuff but they don't
download that and you can't purchase anything with the PoL.
If there is no reason I will be happy to package this one.
Thank you for the answers,
Jirka Konecny
8 years, 1 month
problem submitting update do Bodhi
by waterlan
Hi,
I have created an update for the package wcd. The update has been
uploaded and built successfully. As a last step I try to submit the
update to bodhi, and here I get a failure:
[waterlan@localhost wcd]$ fedpkg update
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedpkg/cli.py:169: DeprecationWarning:
Commands._hash_file is deprecated and will be removed eventually.
Please use Commands.lookasidecache.hash_file instead.
hash = self.cmd._hash_file('bodhi.template', 'sha1')
Creating a new update for wcd-5.3.0-1.fc24
Password for waterlan:
Creating a new update for wcd-5.3.0-1.fc24
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/bodhi", line 532, in <module>
main()
File "/usr/bin/bodhi", line 225, in main
data = bodhi.save(**update_args)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py", line
107, in wrapper
raise BodhiClientException(problems)
fedora.client.bodhi.BodhiClientException: Invalid tag: wcd-5.3.0-1.fc24
tagged with [u'f23-updates-candidate', u'epel7-testing-candidate',
u'dist-6E-epel-testing-candidate', u'dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate',
u'f22-updates-candidate', u'f21-updates-candidate']
Unable to determine release from build: wcd-5.3.0-1.fc24
Could not generate update request: Command 'bodhi --new --release master
--file bodhi.template wcd-5.3.0-1.fc24 --username waterlan' returned
non-zero exit status 1
I have tried the bodhi website, https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/, but
there I get a similar message "Unable to determine release from build:
wcd-5.3.0-1.fc24".
How can I fix this?
I'm using Fedora 21 64bit with all updates installed.
best regards,
Erwin Waterlander
8 years, 2 months
quick python packaging question -- /usr/bin/env?
by Matthew Miller
Should python programs which use '#!/usr/bin/env python3' be patched to
call python directly? Is there a use case for packaged programs _not_
using the system python?
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
8 years, 2 months
Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2015-09-24 16:00 - 17:30 UTC)
by James Antill
======================
#fedora-meeting-1: fpc
======================
Meeting started by geppetto at 16:00:34 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-09-24/fpc.2015-09-...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (geppetto, 16:00:34)
* Schedule (geppetto, 16:06:25)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2015-September/011020...
(geppetto, 16:06:27)
* #572 Mass review exception for php-zendframework (geppetto,
16:06:43)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/572 (geppetto, 16:06:44)
* ACTION: Mass review exception for php-zendframework (+1:5, 0:0,
-1:0) (geppetto, 16:16:58)
* #569 texlive bundles lua (geppetto, 16:17:12)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/569 (geppetto, 16:17:12)
* LINK: http://www.luatex.org/ (orionp, 16:20:50)
* #570 Allocating a soft static uid and gid for sssd (geppetto,
16:33:09)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/570 (geppetto, 16:33:10)
* ACTION: Allow allocation of soft static UID/GID for sssd, due to
always being installed (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) (geppetto, 16:43:09)
* #571 sabre/dav bundle exception in Horde (geppetto, 16:43:22)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/571 (geppetto, 16:43:23)
* ACTION: Temporary bundling exception for sabre/dav in
php-horde-Horde-Dav until version 2.x can be used. (+5, 0:0, -1:0)
(geppetto, 16:51:37)
* #567 Packaging Python 3 applications and modules for EPEL 7+
(geppetto, 16:52:19)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567 (geppetto, 16:52:19)
* #566 RPM file triggers (geppetto, 16:54:14)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/566 (geppetto, 16:54:14)
* LINK: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/271129/11404114/ (geppetto,
17:00:45)
* Open Floor (geppetto, 17:01:14)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemPythonExecutablesUseSystemP...
(Rathann, 17:04:31)
Meeting ended at 17:33:11 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* Mass review exception for php-zendframework (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
* Allow allocation of soft static UID/GID for sssd, due to always being
installed (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
* Temporary bundling exception for sabre/dav in php-horde-Horde-Dav
until version 2.x can be used. (+5, 0:0, -1:0)
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* Mass review exception for php-zendframework (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
* Allow allocation of soft static UID/GID for sssd, due to always
being installed (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
* Temporary bundling exception for sabre/dav in php-horde-Horde-Dav
until version 2.x can be used. (+5, 0:0, -1:0)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* geppetto (97)
* tibbs|w (75)
* orionp (34)
* Rathann (18)
* tomspur (16)
* RemiFedora (15)
* zodbot (14)
* tibbs (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
8 years, 2 months
Pseudo top level domain in URL tag
by Christopher Meng
Hi,
Is it OK to use pseudo top level name like .i2p (eepsite) in URL or
some other real top level name for packages? I didn't see guideline
covering this.
Thanks.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
8 years, 2 months
running openssl dhparam in %post
by Daniel Pocock
For reSIProcate 1.10.0, we will support PFS on TLS connections, this
requires a DH parameters file to be generated on each installation of
the package. There is probably a similar requirement for other packages
that have a TLS server and don't generate DH parameters at compile time.
My current solution involves adding the following to %post
if [ ! -e %{_sysconfdir}/repro/dh2048.pem ] ;
then
/usr/bin/openssl dhparam -outform PEM \
-out %{_sysconfdir}/repro/dh2048.pem 2048
chown root:repro %{_sysconfdir}/repro/dh2048.pem
chmod 0640 %{_sysconfdir}/repro/dh2048.pem
fi
and then adding this to %files
%config(missingok) %ghost %{_sysconfdir}/repro/dh2048.pem
The dh2048.pem file is created correctly during package installation but
it is not removed when the package is removed with "rpm -e"
Is there a better way to do this or does it look OK?
8 years, 2 months
Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-09-17 16:00 UTC)
by James Antill
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-09-17 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-09-17 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2015-09-17 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2015-09-17 16:00 Thu UTC <-
2015-09-17 17:00 Thu Europe/London BST
2015-09-17 18:00 Thu Europe/Paris CEST
2015-09-17 18:00 Thu Europe/Berlin CEST
2015-09-17 21:30 Thu Asia/Calcutta IST
------------------new day----------------------
2015-09-18 00:00 Fri Asia/Singapore SGT
2015-09-18 00:00 Fri Asia/Hong_Kong HKT
2015-09-18 01:00 Fri Asia/Tokyo JST
2015-09-18 02:00 Fri Australia/Brisbane EST
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13
= New business =
#topic #566 RPM file triggers
.fpc 566
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/566
#topic #567 Packaging Python 3 applications and modules for EPEL 7+
.fpc 567
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
report of the agenda items can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
the following meeting.
8 years, 2 months
Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures
by Alexander Todorov
На 17.09.2015 в 16:24, Ben Boeckel написа:
>> Ben,
>> is there any way this CMake property be turned on globally ?
>
> When a target is made, the POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE property is set to
> the value of CMAKE_POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE and may then be overridden
> manually. Anything that turns it or the property off explicitly will
> have to be patched. Or do you mean more globally than "this one CMake
> build"?
>
I meant turning it on globally as in "everything built with CMake in Fedora",
like updating the default flags in a RPM macro or updating the default CMake
config in Fedora. Which will change all the packages using CMake once they are
rebuilt.
--
Alex
8 years, 2 months
