Patching LICENSE after upstream fixes
by Link Dupont
Hi packagers,
I have a package that failed rpmlint's incorrect-fsf-address check. I
filed an issue with upstream to fix it, and included a patch & pull
request. Upstream has since accepted the pull request and merged the
fix onto their master branch, but has not yet made a new release that
includes the fix. Should I:
1) Follow strictly the "don't patch the LICENSE file", ignore the
rpmlint error, and wait for a new upstream release
or
2) Patch the LICENSE file, generating a patch off master using
git-format-patch now that upstream has indeed fixed the address
Thanks!
~link
6 years, 11 months
Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2016-12-15 17:00 - 18:30 UTC)
by James Antill
======================
#fedora-meeting-1: fpc
======================
Meeting started by geppetto at 16:59:52 UTC. The full logs are
available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-12-15/fpc.2016-
12-15-16.59.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (geppetto, 16:59:52)
* Schedule (geppetto, 17:34:17)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedor
aproject.org/message/K54GXHASHPYICMY442SY5UTSPN2RVVU2/
(geppetto, 17:34:19)
* #655 meson buildsystem guidelines (geppetto, 17:35:08)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Meson
(Rathann, 17:38:52)
* ACTION: meson buildsystem guidelines (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) (geppetto,
17:48:40)
* #665 SSLCertificateHandling policy update (geppetto, 17:50:50)
* Open Floor (geppetto, 18:14:05)
* LINK:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/attachment/ticket/655/0001-add-VPATH-m
acro.patch
(ignatenkobrain, 18:16:15)
Meeting ended at 18:30:24 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* meson buildsystem guidelines (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* meson buildsystem guidelines (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* ignatenkobrain (55)
* geppetto (54)
* Rathann (54)
* tibbs (32)
* zodbot (20)
* limburgher (12)
* orionp (4)
* smdeep (2)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
6 years, 11 months
Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2016-12-08 17:00 - 18:50 UTC)
by James Antill
======================
#fedora-meeting-1: fpc
======================
Meeting started by geppetto at 17:00:08 UTC. The full logs are
available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-12-08/fpc.2016-
12-08-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (geppetto, 17:00:09)
* Schedule (geppetto, 17:07:12)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedor
aproject.org/message/62VTMZA373AEJC4P5KVERSKLGWDSLNWX/
(geppetto, 17:07:15)
* #660 Review Process Exception: python2 (renamed from python)
(geppetto, 17:07:51)
* Please double check the new obsoletes/provides, as there won't be a
review (geppetto, 17:11:26)
* ACTION: Review Process Exception: python2 (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
(geppetto, 17:11:34)
* Please change source URL to use https (geppetto, 17:11:52)
* #661 Formalize/standardize %check-optional packaging (geppetto,
17:12:20)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134397 has the
real details. (tibbs, 17:14:40)
* ACTION: tibbs to do a draft on #1 and #2 in redhat-rpm-macros,
ignoring #3 (geppetto, 17:30:47)
* #662 Migration of FPC trac to pagure (geppetto, 17:31:04)
* #663 New python egg macros (geppetto, 17:35:06)
* ACTION: New python egg macros (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0) (geppetto,
17:47:40)
* #665 SSLCertificateHandling policy update (geppetto, 17:47:51)
* We'd like a diff. from current guidlines, just so we can easily
know
what changed (geppetto, 18:10:44)
* See/answer random confused questions asked in meeting, we aren't
pk11 experts (geppetto, 18:12:07)
* Open Floor (geppetto, 18:12:23)
* #topic #663 New python egg macros (geppetto, 18:13:08)
* #663 New python egg macros (geppetto, 18:13:13)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python_Eggs (tibbs
,
18:13:32)
* Python sig needs to look at the page (geppetto, 18:24:33)
* Open Floor (geppetto, 18:25:27)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/VersioningCleanup
(tibbs, 18:29:05)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tibbs/VersioningCleanupExamples
(tibbs, 18:30:43)
Meeting ended at 18:49:16 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* Review Process Exception: python2 (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
* tibbs to do a draft on #1 and #2 in redhat-rpm-macros, ignoring #3
* New python egg macros (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* tibbs
* tibbs to do a draft on #1 and #2 in redhat-rpm-macros, ignoring #3
* **UNASSIGNED**
* Review Process Exception: python2 (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
* New python egg macros (+1:6, 0:0, -1:0)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* tibbs (108)
* geppetto (105)
* orionp (33)
* Rathann (31)
* zodbot (14)
* mbooth (7)
* racor (6)
* ignatenkobrain (2)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
6 years, 12 months
R re-base/compile problem
by lejeczek
hi everyone.
this is rpm packaging related, not sure if more than R
itself but before going to R gang I hoped someone here knows:
why this:
byte-compiling package 'compiler'
Warning in file(datafile, "wb") :
cannot open file
'/usr/lib64/R-MY/lib64/R/library/compiler/R/compiler.rdb':
Permission denied
Error in file(datafile, "wb") : cannot open the connection
Calls: <Anonymous> -> code2LazyLoadDB -> makeLazyLoadDB ->
close -> file
Execution halted
happens when I rpmbuild R?
I do a bit of mangling there, but nothing in the sources of
R, just rpm spec files & paths.
Why build process would call this file? (which is not there
anyway)
Weirder is that if rpm packages (of that my custom build)
are already installed, this problem occurs, build fails only
then. Suffice to yum/rpm uninstall those R-MY* packages and
rpmbuild process (of the same R-MY*) is successful.
To me it's strangest thing, but an expert hopefully knows
what is going on there.
many thanks,
L.
7 years