when does package become status stable

[Martin Gansser]

Hi,

I ask specifically of this package, because I already created it on 15 October.

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12999/nuvolaplayer-2....
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12982/nuvolaplayer-2....

Is there something wrong on this ?

[Matthew Miller]

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 04:12:36PM +0100, Martin Gansser wrote:
>  I ask specifically of this package, because I already created it on
> 15 October.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12999/nuvolaplayer-2....
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12982/nuvolaplayer-2....
>  Is there something wrong on this ? 
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#All_other_updates

A package must get a sufficient karma threshold in bodhi (by default,
+3) or wait one week in updates-testing. At that point, the maintainer
can request for it to be pushed to stable. This is done manually by
release engineering, generally once a day.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Fedora Project Leader

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 11:49:38 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:

>  On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 04:12:36PM +0100, Martin Gansser wrote:
>  > I ask specifically of this package, because I already created it on 15 October.
>  >
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12999/nuvolaplayer-2....
>  >
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12982/nuvolaplayer-2....
>  > Is there something wrong on this ?
>  
>  See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#All_other_updates
>  
>  A package must get a sufficient karma threshold in bodhi (by default,
>  +3) or wait one week in updates-testing. At that point, the maintainer
>  can request for it to be pushed to stable. This is done manually by
>  release engineering, generally once a day. 
It seems to me you've missed the one important detail: both updates
have been requested by the maintainer on Oct 20th to be pushed to stable.
That has not happened yet. Has there been a push to F21 and F20 since Oct 20th?

[Matthew Miller]

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 05:27:23PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  It seems to me you've missed the one important detail: both
> updates
>  have been requested by the maintainer on Oct 20th to be pushed to
>  stable. That has not happened yet. Has there been a push to F21 and
>  F20 since Oct 20th? 
I did miss that. I know the push responsiblity generally rotates among
release engineering team members and I'm not sure where that is this
week.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Fedora Project Leader

[Pierre-Yves Chibon]

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:47:28PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>  On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 05:27:23PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  > It seems to me you've missed the one important detail: both updates
>  > have been requested by the maintainer on Oct 20th to be pushed to
>  > stable. That has not happened yet. Has there been a push to F21 and
>  > F20 since Oct 20th?
>  
>  I did miss that. I know the push responsiblity generally rotates among
>  release engineering team members and I'm not sure where that is this
>  week. 
Aren't push froze during freeze ?

Pierre

[Matthew Miller]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:06:13AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>  > I did miss that. I know the push responsiblity generally rotates
> among
>  > release engineering team members and I'm not sure where that is this
>  > week.
>  Aren't push froze during freeze ? 
For f21 ("branched") yes, but f20 shouldn't be affected.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Fedora Project Leader

[Martin Gansser]

>  Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. Oktober 2014 um 16:49 Uhr
>  Von: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  An: "Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora"
> <packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  Betreff: Re: [Fedora-packaging] when does package become status stable
>  On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 04:12:36PM +0100, Martin Gansser wrote:
> > I ask specifically of this package, because I already created it on 15 October.
> >
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12999/nuvolaplayer-2....
> >
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-12982/nuvolaplayer-2....
> /nuvolaplayer-2.4.3-3.fc21?_csrf_token=da3c05212efdead8bf6960b4d45af1997a7af4f9]
> > Is there something wrong on this ?
>  
>  See
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#All_other_updates[http://fed...
>
>  
>  A package must get a sufficient karma threshold in bodhi (by default,
>  +3) or wait one week in updates-testing. At that point, the maintainer
>  can request for it to be pushed to stable. This is done manually by
>  release engineering, generally once a day. 
the package nuvolaplayer is already since 16 October in update-testing (10 days now)
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/20/SRPMS/
why isn't it already in stable ?

Martin

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:28:25 +0100, Martin Gansser wrote:

>  the package nuvolaplayer is already since 16 October in
> update-testing (10 days now)
>  http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/20/SRPMS/
>  why isn't it already in stable ? 
It says "Pushed: false" -- watch this long list (the last pages!):

  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F20/pending

There are lots of other updates that are waiting to be pushed to stable.
When done, your tickets will be updated by bodhi with a comment.