ruby-sig March 2013

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

10 participants
16 discussions

BASH completion for Ruby
by Vít Ondruch 25 May '16

25 May '16

Hi guys, Anybody have any experience with some scripts for bash completion? Have you tried any? Should we integrate any? Just a quick googling gave me two results: https://github.com/mernen/completion-ruby https://github.com/pdkl95/rubygems-completion And there are probably others. I did not tried them yet. Have you? Do you have other/better tips? Thank you Vit

2 3

Bringing GitLab in Fedora
by Axilleas Pipinellis 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

Hello dear list! I am applying for this year's GSOC [0] and I would like to contribute by bringing GitLab [1][2] in Fedora. For those that don't already know GitLab, it is a Self hosted Git management software written on Ruby on Rails, pretty much like github's interface (you can try a demo here [3]). It is a ruby app with lots of dependencies and I think this is a great opportunity to extend the list of packaged gems supported by Fedora. Let alone the fact that with the momentum GitLab has gained (it is in the top 50 most popular open source projects on github) it would be an asset if Fedora had this packaged. Also, the core developer was more than willing to help with the process [4]. I could use any help needed on packaging. I have already exchanged a couple of mails with Vit Ondruch and he pointed me to a direction. In fact I am in the middle of reading all the related stuff from the wiki. So what are your thoughts? Any guidance, ideas or insights are very much appreciated! Regards, Axilleas PS. There is also the thought of deploying GitLab to git repositories on fedorahosted.org, but that's irrelevant to this list. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSOC_2013 [1] http://gitlab.org [2] https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq [3] http://demo.gitlabhq.com/ [4] https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/gitlabhq/SQMDi-yyXmU

7 18

Policy re Gems that don't have RPMs yet?
by Philip Rhoades 08 Jul '13

08 Jul '13

People, A while ago I posted a note on the Devise forum asking if anyone was going to build an RPM for Fedora but didn't get any responses at all - no-one even viewed the post! What happens with Gems in this category? Am I supposed to do anything? Add a request somewhere? Use the Gem instead of an RPM while I wait for someone to do the work for creating the RPM? Should I bite the bullet and see how to produce the RPM myself? Regards, Phil. -- Philip Rhoades GPO Box 3411 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia E-mail: phil(a)pricom.com.au

6 19

package aliases or an alternative package name for a Ruby gem
by Dan Allen 17 May '13

17 May '13

Is it possible to have an alias to a rubygem rpm or are there exceptions to the rule that it must have the rubygem- prefix. I ask in relation to two packages. The first is rubygem-asciidoctor. This package provides both a Ruby library and a system executable. It's a drop-in replacement for the asciidoc package (in most common cases). People are expecting to be able to install an RPM named "asciidoctor", just a few characters extra from "asciidoc" and get the RPM. Instead, they have to be aware it's a rubygem and type "rubygem-asciidoctor". Is it possible to have an alias package in this case like in Debian where it will install rubygem-asciidoctor when you request asciidoctor? The second case is a new package I'm submitting named Awestruct. This is not a Ruby library at all, but strictly a system executable. Do I have to name it "rubygem-awestruct" or can I name it simply "awestruct". Thanks, -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction

4 4

package review swap request (awestruct, bootstrap-sass)
by Dan Allen 29 Mar '13

29 Mar '13

I have two packages I need reviewed rubygem-bootstrap-sass rubygem-awestruct I've never reviewed someone else's package, but I think I've got the hang of the rubygem packages so I think I can do a fair job at it. I'm eager to get these packages out (Awestruct [1] in particular) because there are numerous community projects that have adopted Awestruct and having a package in Fedora really help the reputation of Fedora Ruby. Cheers, -Dan [1] http://awestruct.org -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction

2 1

rspec updated to 2.13.x on rawhide/f19
by Mamoru TASAKA 28 Mar '13

28 Mar '13

Hello, all: I've updated rspec to 2.13.x on rawhide/f19. I expect that nothing special would happen with this version, however please test this. Regards, Mamoru

2 1

Ruby 2.0 RPM - Rails can't find psych
by Peter Deffendol 27 Mar '13

27 Mar '13

Hi, I rebuilt the ruby-2.0.0.0-6 packages on CentOS 6 (requiring a couple of slight modifications to the spec file) and ran into some trouble: [pete@centos railstest]$ ./script/rails c /usr/share/ruby/yaml.rb:6:in `<top (required)>': It seems your ruby installation is missing psych (for YAML output). To eliminate this warning, please install libyaml and reinstall your ruby. /usr/share/ruby/yaml.rb:7:in `require': cannot load such file -- psych (LoadError) from /usr/share/ruby/yaml.rb:7:in `<top (required)>' <snip> I have all of the relevant packages installed - rubygem-psych, libyaml (from EPEL). If I run an irb session, it loads correctly: [pete@centos ~]$ irb irb(main):001:0> require 'yaml' => true I'm not sure where to look. The load path is identical in both situations (puts $:) /usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby /usr/local/lib64/ruby/site_ruby /usr/share/ruby/vendor_ruby /usr/lib64/ruby/vendor_ruby /usr/share/rubygems /usr/share/ruby /usr/lib64/ruby/ Can anyone confirm if this also occurs on the Fedora-built packages, and have any idea as to why this is happening? Thanks! Pete -- Pete Deffendol pete(a)deffendol.org

2 5

Review swaps
by Mamoru TASAKA 22 Mar '13

22 Mar '13

Hello, all: I have 6 rubygems related review requests which need reviewers rubygem-unf_ext - Unicode Normalization Form support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892314 rubygem-unf Wrapper library to bring Unicode Normalization Form support to Ruby/JRuby (needs rubygem-unf_ext) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904639 rubygem-domain_name - Domain Name manipulation library for Ruby (needs rubygem-unf) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904640 rubygem-gdk3 - Ruby binding of GDK-3.x https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912960 rubygem-gtk3 - Ruby binding of GTK+-3.x (needs rubygem-gdk3) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912961 rubygem-syck - Gemified version of Syck from Ruby's stdlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922460 I would like to swap these review requests with one of yours. Regards, Mamoru

1 0

%gem_install macro
by Vít Ondruch 22 Mar '13

22 Mar '13

Hi everybody, I have noticed, that although you are updating your packages to be buildable with F19, you are not doing it properly. The %gem_install macro, which is mentioned in guidelines, was not introduced just to annoy you. It should help you. You probably did not noticed, but without the macro, your package does not contain generated RDoc documentation anymore. Please fix your packages. If you want to have your life a bit easier, I prepared update script for you [1]. The f19.rb is doing the basic conversion. If you want to update also the changelog, then please use the update.rb. Thank you. Vít [1] https://github.com/voxik/fermig

3 5

rubygem-asciidoctor stuck in testing queue
by Dan Allen 18 Mar '13

18 Mar '13

The RPMs for the rubygem-asciidoctor package (F17 and F18) have been approved, I built them on koji and published them to bodhi. However, they are currently stuck there waiting for karma points. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-asciidoctor If you have a few moments, would you mind testing them and giving them a thumbs up? I put specific testing instructions on the README: https://github.com/asciidoctor/rubygem-asciidoctor-rpm#test-the-asciidoctor… If, by chance, the karma points aren't needed for a new package, can the package be pushed to the update channels now? Thanks, -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig March 2013