ruby-sig July 2014

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
6 discussions

BASH completion for Ruby
by Vít Ondruch 25 May '16

25 May '16

Hi guys, Anybody have any experience with some scripts for bash completion? Have you tried any? Should we integrate any? Just a quick googling gave me two results: https://github.com/mernen/completion-ruby https://github.com/pdkl95/rubygems-completion And there are probably others. I did not tried them yet. Have you? Do you have other/better tips? Thank you Vit

2 3

RSpec 3
by Julian C. Dunn 08 Sep '14

08 Sep '14

Hi again, I’ve been packaging more and more stuff that is using RSpec 3 in test suites. We currently have RSpec 2.14.1 even in rawhide. Is anyone working on an upgrade? Or providing RSpec 3 in parallel? I realize it’s a big undertaking to do this, but it sucks not to be able to run tests in %check because of all the breaking changes. - Julian [ Julian C. Dunn <jdunn(a)aquezada.com> * Sorry, I'm ] [ WWW: http://www.aquezada.com/staff/julian * only Web 1.0 ] [ gopher://sdf.org/1/users/keymaker/ * compliant! ] [ PGP: 91B3 7A9D 683C 7C16 715F 442C 6065 D533 FDC2 05B9 ]

5 11

Github common namespace for Fedora Ruby projects
by Achilleas Pipinellis 28 Aug '14

28 Aug '14

I had raised this issue [0] some time ago, but it deserves its own discussion with the rest of the Fedora Ruby community. So, here it is. Some already raised points: 1) We should decide on the namespace. For that concern I have already taken 'fedora-ruby' and 'fedoraruby' if we decide on either of these. Since I'm currently the creator I get ownership to all projects under this namespace. For that matter I can drop the name and then one of you, Vit or Mo or whoever, can register the namespace again to get full ownership. 2) Owners/collaborators of the transfered projects must retain their rights. Github doesn't offer much diversity with user rights unfortunately but we'll figure it out. Projects that could share the namespace: 1. gem2rpm [1] 2. rubypick [2] 3. pkgwat [3] 4. gem-compare [4] 5. isitfedoraruby [5][6] So, what do you think? -------- [0] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby/issues/50 [1] https://github.com/lutter/gem2rpm [2] https://github.com/bkabrda/rubypick [3] https://github.com/daviddavis/pkgwat [4] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare [5] https://github.com/zuhao/isitfedoraruby [6] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby -- FAS : axilleas GPG : 0xABF99BE5 Blog: http://axilleas.me

4 4

gem-compare: A new tool for tracking upstream changes
by Josef Stribny 06 Aug '14

06 Aug '14

Hi all, I would like to announce the first release of the gem-compare[0] plugin, a tool made to simplified the process of updating gems in Fedora. Instead of manually fetching and unpacking new gem releases, comparing their dependencies, and using grep and diff tools to check the differences between the releases I decided to automate this process as much as I can. The result was a script that I decided to turn into a RubyGems plugin for clarity and ease of use. The main purpose of the tool is to report the differences between: * gemspec parameters such as license, authors, homepage, ... * runtime and development dependencies * Gemfile dependencies * files including shebangs and permissions modifications The usage is as follows: $ gem compare rails 3.0.0 4.0.0 -k I usually run it in the git directory of the associated Fedora package so it downloads the missing new version, unpacks both, run the comparison and print the results. I then can go straight to editing the .spec file and update what is necessary. However, you can use the tool in many other ways, e.g. running: $ gem compare rails '>=3.0.0' --runtime will reveal that activeresource dependency was dropped in 4.0.0 and actionview dependency was added in 4.1.0. Please see more examples at GitHub[0] and all valid options with: $ gem compare --help To install it, simply run: $ gem install gem-compare Once it's more tested and bugs[1] are resolved I will package it for Fedora. I didn't package it yet because it needs one dependency that is not yet in Fedora repositories. I would like to kindly ask you to help me to test it and tell me what you think. Best Regards Josef [0] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare [1] https://github.com/strzibny/gem-compare/issues

3 5

Help with reviewing OBS packages needed
by Josef Stribny 24 Jul '14

24 Jul '14

Hi all, I am packaging OBS for fedora and would like to get in many of the RubyGem dependencies for the OBS frontend. If you could help me and do a review or swap a review, that would be great. So far I packaged: pundit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121085 cocoon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121084 clockwork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121082 codemirror-rails https://github.com/fixlr/codemirror-rails/issues/28 https://github.com/fixlr/codemirror-rails/issues/29 cssmin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121081 sprite-factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121080 websocket-driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121075 cliver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121074 Big thanks! Josef

1 1

Update status on isitifedoraruby
by Achilleas Pipinellis 24 Jul '14

24 Jul '14

Hey there, I thought some of you might want to check how the refactoring of isitfedoraruby goes. Here's a short changelog for the previous month. - Remove unused code (sorry Mo...) - Remove HistoricalGems model - Remove Build controller/view - Remove methods related to local spec/gem downloading - Remove empty helpers - Cleaned routes, removed unused ones - Conform to ruby/rails style guide, ~500 errors/warnings fixed - Maintainer field for packages is now using the fas_name - Automatically fetch versions of Fedora by querying the pkgdb api - Addded rake task to fetch rawhide version and store it in a file locally - Show koji builds from supported Fedora versions only - Bugs - Query bugs via api using pkgwat - Show only open Fedora bugs, exclude EPEL ones - Drop `is_open` from bugs table - Hover over links to see full titles when truncated eg. bugs (to be pushed) - Rename builds table to koji_builds for clarity - Added tests - Unit tests for models (not yet finished, integration tests to be added) - Added Github services - travis-ci - hound-ci - coveralls - gemnasium - Development tools - shoulda-matchers - rspec - capybara - rack-mini-profiler - rubocop - factory_girl - annotate - railsroady I will include this changelog in the app and update it whenever I make a change worth noted. Also it would be fun if there were versions, so I added a v0.9.0 to the changelog :p By the end of the summer I hope to get on releasing 1.0 :) A testing instance can be found at [0]. Please report any bugs/feature requests at github [1]. Plans to do from now on: - Deploy on opeshift - Refactor rake tasks (see [2]) - Use api calls wherever possible - Work on additional features - dependency checker - gemfile tool - packaging progress of a gem - UI refactor: I kinda hate how it looks like a common bootstrap theme :p I have a lot of ideas on how to make it appealing, but I know little of design/css/js so I'll take my time. I'm seriously considering switching to foundation[3] though which is more straightforward than bootstrap. - Documentation on - contributing - deploying - testing - using rake tasks There are probably many things I miss now, I'll keep you posted. Thanks for reading :) [0] http://fedoraruby.axilleas.me [1] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby/issues [2] https://github.com/axilleas/isitfedoraruby/issues/13 [3] https://github.com/zurb/foundation-rails -- FAS : axilleas GPG : 0xABF99BE5 Blog: http://axilleas.me

4 12

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig July 2014