ruby-sig January 2021

ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org

4 participants
6 discussions

Ruby 2.2
by Vít Ondruch 22 Sep '23

22 Sep '23

Hi everybody, Since Ruby 2.2 is going to be released during Christmas and -preview1 release is imminent (this Wednesday?), it is probably time to start looking into its packaging. So here is the updated .spec file [1] and scratch build [2], which can be finally build on all platforms. Sorry, no Copr for you, since Ruby's build fails there due to old RHEL kernel :/. What has changed from packaging point of view? Luckily, not much, but here are a few bullets which comes to my mind: * RPM 4.12 introduces new %load function, which is used to load RPM macros during RPM build. This allowed to drop my custom RPM macro [3]. On the other hand, you'll be able to build the Ruby only on F21+ (luckily, you should be able to build SRPM everywhere). * The RubyGems filesystem was not explicit enough, so there might be something accidentally packages. This is now more explicit, so we should be safer. * Ruby now ships with MiniTest and Test::Unit. The very good news is that they are installed so far as a regular gems. This means that you have to always specify them in your Gemfile, if you are using Bundler, but this is generally step in good direction. I hope that upstream will not change their mind :) Due to this change, we have new subpackages rubygem-test-unit (and rubygem-power_assert, which is now Test::Unit's dependency). No more %{_bindir}/testrb (but nobody is using it these days anyway, right? ;) * Some prevailing test failures were resolved, some others introduced, but hopefully they'll get resolved prior stable release. Generally, I'd say that not much has changed since 2.1, which is good news. Please test the packaging if you can and let me know about any issues you encountered. Also, if you have any other suggestions about Ruby packaging in general, what we could improve etc, this is probably good time to share. It seems that OpenSUSE guys are improving their packaging, so you might want to get some inspiration there [4, 5, 6] ;) Vít [1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/log/?h=private-ruby-2.2 [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7578843 [3] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ruby.git/commit/?h=private-ruby-2.2&id=8… [4] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby-common [5] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:darix:ruby/ruby2.2 [6] https://github.com/openSUSE/gem2rpm/commits/master

4 19

rubygem-openssl is going to be bundled in Ruby
by Vít Ondruch 28 Jan '21

28 Jan '21

Hi, Following the bundling of Racc [1] and did_you_mean [2], I am forced to bundle also OpenSSL. This is due to the StdLib symlinks together with `require_relative` [3] causing double loading issues, e.g.: ~~~ $ ruby --disable-gems -e 'require "openssl"; require "openssl/digest"' /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::MD4 /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of MD4 was here /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::MD5 /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of MD5 was here /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::RIPEMD160 /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of RIPEMD160 was here /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::SHA1 /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of SHA1 was here /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::SHA224 /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of SHA224 was here /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::SHA256 /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of SHA256 was here /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::SHA384 /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of SHA384 was here /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: already initialized constant OpenSSL::Digest::SHA512 /usr/share/gems/gems/openssl-2.2.0/lib/openssl/digest.rb:45: warning: previous definition of SHA512 was here /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:52:in `<class:Digest>': superclass mismatch for class Digest (TypeError) from /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:16:in `<module:OpenSSL>' from /usr/share/ruby/openssl/digest.rb:15:in `<top (required)>' from -e:1:in `require' from -e:1:in `<main>' ~~~ This is the reason why rubygem-net-ssh is broken ATM [4]. Not sure if upstream is really able to resolve the double loading issue [5]. While I could revert the [3] to resolve the original state, we would need to maintain this patch for the foreseeable future. Therefore it is probably better to keep openssl bundled. This at least will provide experience closer to upstream. Vít [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/baf046a6a4d17fa309c9d20fa3db949f6… [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/ca69f778a9169c7ff172d2cc9c9d31c6f… [3] https://github.com/ruby/openssl/commit/74e03b588f58bcac007d7145c3bb6c4754da… [4] https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-net-ssh [5] https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16978#note-11

2 2

Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild
by Vít Ondruch 27 Jan '21

27 Jan '21

Hi everybody, So here we go. I have asked for side tag for Ruby 3.0 rebuild: ~~~ $ fedpkg request-side-tag Side tag 'f34-build-side-35577' (id 35577) created. Use 'fedpkg build --target=f34-build-side-35577' to use it. Use 'koji wait-repo f34-build-side-35577' to wait for the build repo to be generated. ~~~ and Ruby 3.0 is already built there as you can see at: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=35577&order=-b… or using: ~~~ $ koji list-tagged f34-build-side-35577 ~~~ Now this is a list of packages, which very likely needs rebuild: ~~~ $ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'ruby-devel' | sort | uniq ~~~ You can take the package and just fire rebuild, but please ensure that you are using f34-build-side-35577 build target, i.e. the build command should look like: ~~~ $ fedpkg build --target f34-build-side-35577 ~~~ Please be careful, because if you, by a chance, omit the f34-build-side-35577 target, you'll be building against Ruby 2.7 which is not what you want. If you won't do it by yourself, I'll be rebuilding all packages after I am finished with my packages. I'll be using fermig [1] to help me with that. If you don't want me to touch your packages for whatever reason, please let me know. As always, any help/testing/feedback is welcome. Vít [1] https://github.com/fedora-ruby/fermig

4 22

Ruby 3.0 - tests
by Pavel Valena 11 Jan '21

11 Jan '21

I've run the build in my COPR, but noticed it finished quickly. And found: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/fcc584306bbaf23b7a1e895747768fd59… Why are the tests currently disabled? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1666744 https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/ruby/build/1873156/ Last build to run tests was: ruby-3.0.0-139.fc34 Pavel

2 1

Ruby 3.0 change proposal
by Vít Ondruch 07 Jan '21

07 Jan '21

Hi Rubyists, The release of Ruby 3.0 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.0 change proposal [1]. It is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since I don't expect any controversy. But anyway, please review and let me know if you have any concerns. Vít [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_3.0

2 6

Ruby 2.8
by Vít Ondruch 04 Jan '21

04 Jan '21

Hi everybody, I started early this time and therefore, there is already PR with changes for upcoming Ruby version: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/55 and the build should be available (if succeeds) here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41848663 So far, there are changes in bundled gems. The RSS and REXML gems are not bundled gems, therefore I extracted them into separate subpackages, while Net::Telnet and XMLRPC were dropped from Ruby and therefore ruby-libs now obsoletes these two packages. As always, any feedback is welcome. Vít

6 51

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

ruby-sig January 2021