Hello, Vít:
Vít Ondruch wrote, at 10/13/2012 07:56 PM +9:00:
Thank you Mamoru. Upgrade to 2.11 could make several packages FTBFS,
so I would stay with 2.8 for F18.
Vit
Okay, then I will keep rspec to 2.8.x for F-18.
Dne 11.10.2012 17:21, TASAKA Mamoru napsal(a):
> Hello, ruby-sig folks:
>
> I have just updated rspec rpms to 2.11.x on rawhide (F19)
>
> rubygem-rspec-mocks-2.11.3-1.fc19
> rubygem-rspec-core-2.11.1-1.fc19
> rubygem-rspec-expectations-2.11.3-1.fc19
> rubygem-rspec-2.11.0-1.fc19
>
> Some notes:
> * rubygem-rspec-core does not depend on -expectations and -mocks any
> longer.
> * rubygem-rspec-core no longer contains rspec.rb. If some package needs
> "rspec.rb", replace (Build)Requires: rubygem(rspec-core) to
rubygem(rspec).
>
> I am not sure if we can push rspec 2.11.x also on F-18. F-18 beta
> freeze has not come yet, so maybe it is still not late to push rspec
> 2.11.x also on F-18.
Regards,
Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka(a)fedoraproject.org>