Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

[Mamoru TASAKA]

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28:
>  Dear maintainers.
>  
>  Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
>  will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August 2022).
>  
>  Policy:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...
>  
>  The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 35.
>  
>  This report is based on dist tags.
>  
>  Packages collected via:
>
> https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ft...
>  
>  If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
>  If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me know and we
> can work together to get a FESCo approval for that.
>  
>  If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
>  
>            Package                       (co)maintainers
>  =========================================================================
>  rubygem-coffee-rails                 jaruga, ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch
>  rubygem-minitest-reporters           pvalena
>  rubygem-sprockets-rails              jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig
>   
So the above says "retirement will happen about one week before mass branch
(2022-08-09)",
that is 2022-08-02 or so, so this will happen very soon!

rubygem-sprockets-rails is already fixed (as I posted about 1 weeks ago).

I can fix rubygem-minitest-reporters (scratch build successful), should I push
the fix?

I have not checked rubygem-coffee-rails, sorry.

Regards,
Mamoru

List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 01. 08. 22 v 14:40 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>  Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28:
> > Dear maintainers.
> >
> > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following 
> > packages
> > will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before 
> > branching (August 2022).
> >
> > Policy: 
> >
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...
> >
> > The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since 
> > Fedora 35.
> >
> > This report is based on dist tags.
> >
> > Packages collected via:
> >
> https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ft...
>
> >
> >
> > If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
> > If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please 
> > let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that.
> >
> > If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
> >
> >           Package                       (co)maintainers
> > ========================================================================= 
> >
> > rubygem-coffee-rails                 jaruga, ruby-packagers-sig, 
> > vondruch
> > rubygem-minitest-reporters           pvalena
> > rubygem-sprockets-rails              jaruga, pvalena, ruby-packagers-sig
> >
>
>  So the above says "retirement will happen about one week before mass 
>  branch (2022-08-09)",
>  that is 2022-08-02 or so, so this will happen very soon!
>
>  rubygem-sprockets-rails is already fixed (as I posted about 1 weeks ago).
>
>  I can fix rubygem-minitest-reporters (scratch build successful), 
>  should I push
>  the fix?
>
>  I have not checked rubygem-coffee-rails, sorry.
>  

I have sent comment to the thread on devel ML, but I think that we can 
let go the rubygem-minitest-reporters as well as rubygem-coffee-rails.


Vít


>  Regards,
>  Mamoru
>  _______________________________________________
>  ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives: 
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...
>  Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
>  https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>