Hello everyone,
I dont usually like to cross post to multiple DLs but since These are Ruby specific the Ruby SIG folks want to make sure the packages are following their standards.
In order to get the pre-prerequisites needed for OpenNebula support in Fedora Cloud, I would like some help in package reviews if you can spare some cycles.
Could the Ruby SIG and or Cloud SIG please review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728051 (Review Request: rubygem-stringex - Extensions to Rubys String class)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 (Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721179 (Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 (Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling)
3rd party packaging, they need a sponsor: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 (Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library)
Once these are all approved, I will begin submitting rubygems for:
Rubygem Datamapper and its sub-rubygems (rubygem-dm-*) Rubygem Dataobjects and its sub-rubygems (rubygem-do-*)
Then finally OpenNebula 3.0 itself.
Thanks for your help, Shawn.
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:57:20 AM Shawn Starr wrote:
Hello everyone,
I dont usually like to cross post to multiple DLs but since These are Ruby specific the Ruby SIG folks want to make sure the packages are following their standards.
In order to get the pre-prerequisites needed for OpenNebula support in Fedora Cloud, I would like some help in package reviews if you can spare some cycles.
Is there any chance someone can please review these?
Could the Ruby SIG and or Cloud SIG please review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728051 (Review Request: rubygem-stringex - Extensions to Rubys String class)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728088 (Review Request: rubygem-idn - Ruby Bindings for the GNU LibIDN library)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721179 (Review Request: rubygem-extlib - Support library for DataMapper and Merb)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 (Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling)
3rd party packaging, they need a sponsor: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719854 (Review Request: rubygem-xmlparser-0.6.81-1 - Ruby bindings to the Expat XML parsing library)
Once these are all approved, I will begin submitting rubygems for:
Rubygem Datamapper and its sub-rubygems (rubygem-dm-*) Rubygem Dataobjects and its sub-rubygems (rubygem-do-*)
Then finally OpenNebula 3.0 itself.
Thanks for your help, Shawn.
Is there any chance someone can please review these?
Unfortunately don't have the cycles myself but since you're a proven packager, I'd just ask on fedora-devel, or just watch that as there are package swap requests that come through all the time. Most likely you can swap a few requests at the very least very quickly.
-Mo
ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org