On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 10:51 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
(Overall, the basic process looks solid, and the 2010 goals still
seem
correct.)
If the FUDCon process is under review, could the FAD process be looked
at too? It also mentions that the FPL needs to approve a FAD and so on.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_organize_a_FAD
The FUDCon process is a lot better documented - it has a suggested
timeline and so on. The FAD page has none of this and has lead to some
confusion in the past.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha