On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 16:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Matthew Miller
<snip good info>
> I think this is something on the order of an Objective rather than
> a change/feature proposal because it's actually a rather tall
> order. On
> the technical side, currently OpenShift can't be easily packaged
> because it includes some 200+ Go libraries, and we don't even have
> approved Go packaging guidelines. This probably means we'd be
> for a very large bundling exception (note 'Active upstream Security
> Team' as part of the justification). On the less technical but
> important side, I'd like to see related marketing and
> and coordination with Fedora Atomic and the Fedora Cloud WG, and
> possibly with Fedora Server as well (I know OpenShift node as
> role is already under some consideration).
> Thoughts, comments, thrown vegetables?
Do you have someone in mind to lead this objective? If so, is there
reason they didn't propose this themselves?
I'm having a conversation about Fedora Server and OpenShift with Joe
Brockmeier later this morning. I'll include this as a topic of
conversation and see where it leads.