On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 16:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Matthew Miller mattdm@fedoraproject.org wrote:
<snip good info>
I think this is something on the order of an Objective rather than just a change/feature proposal because it's actually a rather tall order. On the technical side, currently OpenShift can't be easily packaged because it includes some 200+ Go libraries, and we don't even have approved Go packaging guidelines. This probably means we'd be asking for a very large bundling exception (note 'Active upstream Security Team' as part of the justification). On the less technical but still important side, I'd like to see related marketing and documentation, and coordination with Fedora Atomic and the Fedora Cloud WG, and possibly with Fedora Server as well (I know OpenShift node as server role is already under some consideration).
Thoughts, comments, thrown vegetables?
Do you have someone in mind to lead this objective? If so, is there a reason they didn't propose this themselves?
I'm having a conversation about Fedora Server and OpenShift with Joe Brockmeier later this morning. I'll include this as a topic of conversation and see where it leads.