This package just numbers their tarballs using the subversion release
number. For example, 'r8' and 'r11':
http://code.google.com/p/dlfcn-win32/downloads/list
As far as I'm aware they are not planning on using "real" version
numbers at any time in the future, nor have they used real version
numbers in the past.
I don't understand which if any of these guidelines apply to this
case:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease
In particular, what should the Version be? (And while we're at it,
what should the Release be?)
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v