-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/17/2015 07:30 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:53:09AM +0000, Mat Booth wrote:
>> 1) add readme file only to %doc 2) add readme file only to
>> %license 3) add readme to both %doc and %license 4) cut file in
>> two parts
> Actually I don't mind options 1, 2 or 3 (all of these options
> fulfil the legal obligations of the license, right?) -- 4 seems
> like unnecessary effort for no real gain.
Don't forget the "nodocs" use case, which the separate license tag
helps cover. That means 2 or 3 is preferable to 1. My suggestion
would be to go with 3 and then to ask upstream to separate it out.
Ideally, if they're using a standard license, we can in the future
deduplicate identical license files, too, but only if they're just
the license alone in a file.
Just to clarify, Option 1 would not in fact be legally acceptable in
many cases (because installation with --nodocs could then result in an
installation that did not meet license requirements of having the text
present on the installed system).
I agree with Matthew's recommendation here.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlZystUACgkQeiVVYja6o6PmxgCeO7bainAZbFIdMDgXTW3iwncT
E7sAnRM66UyQN8RoqXry7ILZNXSmpTBR
=donN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----