On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 14:35 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>> "SS" == Simo Sorce
SS> I haven't found any Fedora Packaging rules or otherwise any
SS> recommendation on transforming a PEP440 package version number to an
SS> RPM NVR.
Don't the existing versioning guidelines already cover this, though? I
don't see how they fail to do so.
Isn't that pretty much what you describe? (Except that in the very last
case should be name-0.2.0-2.post1 because the release integer must
I was looking for something specific to PEP 440
equivalence/normalization rules, I guess there aren't and there is no
interest in being overly prescriptive for this case ?
The common rules do allow me to create packages that will update
properly though, and I can certainly figure out my way in the ambiguous
cases, so they suffice for the time being.
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York