On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 09:39 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 02:57 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> I wouldn't want someone who needs to
> patch Makefile.[am/in] to wind up regenerating configure--that's silly.
It's not that silly, because newer automake/aclocal's require newer
Good point; but automake isn't terribly aggressive about this. For
instance, I don't think automake 1.10 depends on any autoconf
features/fixes past 2.59. In general, I think one is better off using
the packaged configure until it breaks.
Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden(a)endoframe.com>