Le 08/11/2013 08:33, Bohuslav Kabrda a écrit :
> When scl-utils vendor is not the package vendor this inconsitency
create
> an issue.
That is solved by redefining _scl_prefix in your own metapackage. I really don't see
the problem.
This is exactly the problem = > you don't see the problem.
You cannot redefine _scl_prefix in each package.
- this will be redundant and tricky
- you don't know which is the correct directory (owned by foo-runtime)
Definitively, I think I must forgive the idea of extending RHSCL in EPEL.
If RHSCL users want to extends existing SCL, they will have to rely on
themselves or Red Hat?
Remi.