On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 5:12 AM Petr Viktorin <pviktori(a)redhat.com> wrote:
While "Deploy the functionality of this python file in the appropriate
manner" would be great, it would need to guess too much. The filename
doesn't have enough info.
%pycached's very limited scope is a feature. It should be a reliable
tool that you can use manually, or later as part of a more complex system.
As for the name, I hope y'all don't mind that we skipped the
bikeshedding and went with %pycached after considering the alternatives
Not a problem. I didn't note the date to the email I was replying to.
(I am still processing through a ridiculous amount of email from my
vacation). I'm good with how things turned out.