On 10/13/2011 06:41 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:35:28PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III
>>>>>> "AG" == Andy Grimm<agrimm(a)gmail.com> writes:
> AG> I don't think there's any need to send email for every review; I
> AG> wouldn't want that on any list.
> Well, actually, all of that traffic is already on a list (the
> package-review list). I subscribe and there were times when I actually
> read all of the traffic there.
> Anyway, I've gone back and forth about using this list or -devel. I'd
> hate to have "yet another list (TM)" but I'd hate to annoy anyone (and
> trying to do things in -devel is mostly pointless).
> So maybe start here and move to a separate list of the volume becomes
> too high?
+1. I've not yet summoned the time to participate in the Package Review SIG
and I don't see a problem with sharing this list for now. Likely, the
questions that arise around package review would end up on this list anyhow.
IMO, this list should remain restricted to resolving packaging
principles and to resolving corner-cases/precedences (An "expert list")
At least I do not want to this list to become a newbie forum nor "yet
another source" of review spam. You might not want to hear this, but to
me personally, the chatter and the bureaucrazy's (typo intended) noise
on package-review@ already is beyond "being bearable".