Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:53:58AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> In my personal descending order of preference I would do one of these:
> Version: 0
> Release: 1.rNNN
Thanks ..
For the moment I've used:
Version: 0.1
Release: 0.1.r11
What issue are you trying to solve by this choice?
You are not solving anything.
How about the Release number: Isn't it more correct to use
0.<n>.r<mm>
instead of <n>.r<mm>? (I mean, in case upstream decides to use 0 or
0.1 as a real version number later on?)
The release numbers don't really
matter. Much about them is personal
preference and personal use-case.
I would reject it due to your
choice of version.
Ralf